Update Location. Report incorrect product info or prohibited items. Son of Destruction - eBook Average rating: 0 out of 5 stars, based on 0 reviews Write a review.
Son of Destruction
Kit Reed. Book Format: eBook. Sold by Kobo. About This Item We aim to show you accurate product information. Manufacturers, suppliers and others provide what you see here, and we have not verified it. See our disclaimer. Son of Destruction - eBook. Customer Reviews. Write a review. Ask a question. Pricing policy About our prices. We're committed to providing low prices every day, on everything.
So if you find a current lower price from an online retailer on an identical, in-stock product, tell us and we'll match it. See more details at Online Price Match. Email address. Please enter a valid email address.
Watch the Videos in the link below
Walmart Services. With Judas, he withdrew that protection so that Satan could enter into his heart and tempt him. With that temptation, Judas was allowed to choose to betray Jesus--which he did. Judas intentionally plotted against Jesus and consented to the betrayal. Therefore was fully guilty of the betrayal. The main doctrinal difference between the various interpretations is the one already mentioned: the question of free will. I think some perspective on the matter can be found in Luke:.
- Der Wehrbeauftragte. Ein effektives Kontrollorgan über die Bundeswehr? (German Edition).
- The Method of No-Method: The Chan Practice of Silent Illumination.
- Global Shift: Asia, Africa, and Latin America, 1945-2007;
- Site Information Navigation.
- Big Book of Ballads.
- PAPERBACKS FROM HELL.
Luke See also Matthew 7. This is a warning: even though it's inevitable that "offenses" will happen, do not be the offender! It was necessary that one of the Apostles would become a Son of Perdition and betray Jesus, and it's likely that the Pharisees would have accepted and even tried to solicit help from several of the members of their hated rival's inner circle, but Judas was the one who accepted the job. Given that, it looks like the closest translation into plain English is the one given by the Jerusalem Bible.
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site the association bonus does not count. Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead? Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered.
Dymocks - (ebook) Son of Destruction, eBook ()
Ask Question. In John 17, Jesus prays and says of his disciples, 12 While I was with them, I was keeping them in Your name which You have given me; and I guarded them and not one of them perished but the son of perdition , so that the Scripture would be fulfilled. Examples: the son of perdition : King James and many of its derivatives; also Douay-Rheims, from the Vulgate's filius perditionis the son of destruction : English Standard Version, World English Bible, New American Bible the one doomed to destruction : New International Version the one destined to be lost : New Revised Standard Version, New Jerusalem Bible the man who was bound to be lost : Good News Bible the one who chose to be lost : Jerusalem Bible the one who was already lost : Christian Community Bible It seems to me that there are differences in how much agency is assigned to Judas here.
James T James T Interesting question! The Greek words used here are huois tes apoleias "houis" The Strongs number for this is G Translation The literal translation of this phrase would be "son of destruction" or "son of ruin". In Context If we look at what Jesus is saying here, he's saying that he saved and protected all of his disciples except for Judas.
Was Judas innocent?
First Presbyterian Church, Jackson, Mississippi
If we read further in Luke we see this passage: Luke NIV Emphasis added 4 And Judas went to the chief priests and the officers of the temple guard and discussed with them how he might betray Jesus. Summary Jesus was protecting the apostles from being tempted by Satan. Richard Richard Are you saying that e.
Given my full explanation, I think all of the translations are acceptable.
Paraphrases tend to pull theology from other places in the bible in order to interpret specific phrases. So, the literal translation is most accurate to the original. The other translations tend to reflect theology found in other parts of the bible rather than the original language.
Sunset review – intrigue and terror as the shadow of war falls on Budapest
I think some perspective on the matter can be found in Luke: Luke 1 Then said he unto the disciples, It is impossible but that offences will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come! Like any library, Christianity Stack Exchange offers great information, but does not offer personalized advice , and does not take the place of seeking such advice from your pastor, priest, or other trustworthy counselor.
Featured on Meta. Custom Filters release announcement.
Related Son of Destruction
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved